Pakistan’s Railway System: A Journey Fraught with Corruption

Asem Mustafa Awan

Islamabad: In the heart of a third-world country, a stark tableau unfolds—a carefree child, not yet in his teens, joyfully navigates the railway tracks, balancing precariously while clutching the ears of two goats. His delight, however, belies a deeper and graver reality—the perilous state of Pakistan’s railway infrastructure. As the child runs with his pets, a larger narrative emerges—one of systemic neglect, corruption, and the tragic loss of lives that remain uncounted and unacknowledged in the annals of Pakistan’s railway history.

The railway tracks, once symbolic of progress and connectivity, now stand as open conduits of danger, lacking the barriers and warnings needed to protect unsuspecting pedestrians. The absence of safety measures poses a severe threat, with tragic incidents claiming lives in numbers that remain shrouded in ambiguity. The lives lost on these tracks, deemed inconsequential in the broader landscape, underscore the urgent need for reform within the country’s railway sector.

The carefree image of the child with his pets is a microcosm of a larger problem deeply rooted in systemic negligence. The open and unsecured railway tracks symbolize the failure of authorities to implement stringent safety protocols, leaving vulnerable lives exposed to inherent dangers. The lack of barriers, warning signals, and supervised crossings amplifies the risks, especially for children who remain oblivious to the potential perils that lurk on the tracks.

The degradation of Pakistan’s railways, once a thriving and profitable organization, is a consequence of rampant corruption that has infiltrated every facet of the system. What was once a symbol of national pride has succumbed to financial distress, burdened by debt and unable to fulfill its primary duty of ensuring public safety. The erosion of financial stability has not only compromised the efficiency of the railways but has also contributed to the neglect of safety measures and essential infrastructure maintenance.

The child’s gleeful run along the tracks serves as a poignant commentary on the state of the railways—a system burdened by debt, corruption, and a lack of accountability. The tragic history of accidents, often attributed to signal failures, track malfunctions, and compromised personnel, reveals a deeper malaise that permeates the institution. The political patronage in hiring practices has further exacerbated the issue, with positions often secured through graft rather than merit.

The apathy of policymakers and government functionaries towards the common public is glaringly evident. The details captured in the image over the railway bridge paint a somber picture of national indifference. The warning signs against crossing tracks, coupled with the threat of arrest, remain hollow gestures in the face of systemic negligence. The lives lost in preventable accidents are relegated to a realm of statistical obscurity, underscoring the callous disregard for the value of human life.

Pakistan’s railways, once an emblem of progress, demand a comprehensive overhaul. The safety of pedestrians, particularly children, must be prioritized through the installation of barriers, warning signals, and education campaigns aimed at raising awareness. Simultaneously, combating corruption within the railway system is imperative for restoring financial health and fostering an environment of accountability.

The child’s seemingly carefree run on the railway tracks is a poignant metaphor for the larger challenges plaguing Pakistan’s railway system. The perils on the tracks extend beyond the immediate danger—they reflect the corrosion of a once-proud institution, crippled by corruption and neglect. The urgent need for reform echoes in the footsteps of the child, beckoning a future where railway tracks no longer symbolize danger but serve as conduits of progress, safety, and national pride.

The writer is a journalist based in Islamabad and writes on a wide range of issues.

The article is the writer’s opinion, it may or may not adhere to the organization’s editorial policy.

Post Views: 214