Kite Flying Becomes a Non-Bailable Offense

News Desk

Rawalpindi: While the Rawalpindi police continues its awareness campaign against kite flying and aerial firing, concerns are being raised over the effectiveness and priorities of law enforcement in the district.

On the orders of City Police Officer (CPO) Syed Khalid Hamdani, an awareness walk was held within the Cantt police station’s jurisdiction, highlighting the supposed dangers of kite flying, particularly for the youth.

The campaign, which involved pamphlet distribution and lectures in schools, emphasized the legal consequences of the activity, labeling kite flying as a non-bailable offense with punishments ranging from three to seven years in prison.

Despite the police’s strong rhetoric, questions arise over whether such severe legal consequences are proportionate to the offense, especially when the city grapples with more pressing issues such as street crime, drug abuse, and other forms of violence.

Critics argue that while public safety is essential, the excessive criminalization of kite flying—an activity deeply rooted in local culture—diverts police resources from more urgent law enforcement needs.

During recent raids, Chauntra police arrested a man, identified as Idrees, for possessing 135 kites and 13 strings, while Ganjmandi police apprehended Rafael and Haider Ali for 90 kites.

Such actions raise concerns about whether authorities are disproportionately targeting small-time individuals rather than addressing the bigger problem of illegal kite manufacturing and supply chains.

Additionally, the enforcement measures have led to warnings that legal action will also be taken against homeowners if kite flying or aerial firing is reported from their rooftops. This policy could further criminalize innocent citizens who may have no involvement in such activities but could face legal repercussions due to others’ actions.

Many citizens believe that rather than imposing severe legal consequences, the authorities should adopt a more balanced approach perhaps allowing regulated kite flying zones while taking strict action against the use of dangerous materials such as metal strings.

Parents were urged to monitor their children, but there is little acknowledgment of the need for community engagement in preserving cultural traditions in a safe manner.

As the police intensify their operations, the question remains: is an absolute ban and heavy-handed enforcement truly the best way forward, or should authorities seek a more pragmatic approach that balances public safety with cultural heritage?