Good Morning: Motivating or Tedious!

Ishtiaq Ahmed 

Bradford: The custom of saying “Good morning!” is a small yet meaningful gesture that has evolved over time while retaining its universal appeal.

Originally, saying “Good morning” was a personal way to greet loved ones, announce one’s presence at home or work, or start a conversation in a friendly, courteous way. It set a warm tone, whether at the breakfast table or arriving at the office.

However, with the rise of digital communication—texting, WhatsApp, and other messaging platforms—the practice has shifted from an in-person ritual to a daily online habit, and for some, a point of digital etiquette.

For many, exchanging “Good morning” messages online creates a new kind of bond with family and friends who are physically distant.

A simple “Good morning” text has become a way of saying, “I’m here, thinking of you, and wishing you well.”

Read More: https://thepenpk.com/us-elections-count-down-heat/

Especially for loved ones separated by distance, this routine has become a meaningful way of staying connected and offering reassurance.

Yet, the digital age has added new dimensions to this tradition. While some cherish daily morning messages, others feel that the practice has become robotic, losing the warmth and sincerity that is conveyed face-to-face.

A “Good morning” text from a friend may not carry the same impact as a cheerful greeting shared in person with a smile.

There’s also the matter of expectations.  Skipping a “Good morning” message—whether intentionally or unintentionally—can prompt  a concern among family and friends for whom receiving a good morning is an indication of you being well and buoyant.

Regular greetings build an unspoken habit and, for many, offer a comforting consistency. For some, these morning messages bring joy and a sense of connection; they look forward to them as part of their day. It makes them feel better that someone  is thinking of them.

However, it’s also easy for the practice to feel like a robotic obligation which people indulge  in without thinking.

On a personal note, after discussing this with friends, I realised that despite the risk of the greeting becoming routine, many of my family and friends find it valuable for maintaining connections.

For example, my children are deeply concerned about my well-being if they don’t receive my regular “Good morning” message, sent around Fajr prayer time.

Read More:https://thepenpk.com/not-in-your-prerogative-to-take-life/

Saying “Good morning” is polite and courteous, much like saying “please” and “thank you” in daily life. It’s more than a greeting; it’s a simple way to wish someone well for the day.

We each start our mornings with certain rituals—whether making coffee, working out, or other small routines—to set a positive tone.

Greetings are much the same. They uplift and motivate the people around us. Even if you’re not a morning person, the “Good morning” greeting can make a bigger difference than you think, helping to create positive social interactions.

However, there is a need to be mindful that people’s needs vary, especially during challenging times, and adjusting our approach accordingly.

It’s about creating a space where people feel supported, whether through an empathetic message or a quiet show of solidarity.

This kind of discernment can go a long way in building trust and showing that we genuinely care about their well-being.

However, I am mindful that this may not be the case for all the people all the time. Their needs vary, especially during challenging and difficult times.

It is about creating space for people to feel supported, for example, by an empathetic message or a quite show of solidarity. Therefore, there is a need to be reflective and discerning.

While saying “Good morning” with a smile may feel awkward at first, it’s a valuable habit that improves communication. And, like most good habits, it gets easier with practice.

The author is a British citizen of Pakistani origin with a keen interest in Pakistani and international affairs.

The article is the writer’s opinion, it may or may not adhere to the organization’s editorial policy.